Back to Homepage
Tribes discussing new Oklahoma wagering laws
Oklahoma Tribes Discuss Wagering Bill Laws & Regulations

Oklahoma Tribes Discuss New Wagering Bill

Lisa SpencerBy Lisa Spencer Senior Editor Updated: 04 November 2024
Lisa Spencer Lisa Spencer Senior Editor

As a Senior Editor at Betting.US, Lisa Spencer is a valuable member of our expert team. With a Master’s degree in Applied Mathematics, Lisa is adept in gambling theory and analyzing odds. She contributes by writing online sportsbook reviews and finding competitive markets to help our readers make an informed choice.

Last year, Governor Kevin Stitt introduced a new plan for legal sports wagering that restarted the implementation discussion. Specifically, the Indian tribes in Oklahoma are concerned the current plans will hurt their revenue and that the governor has not consulted them on proper implementation. As new bills are introduced, the tribes plan how to approach this discussion.

Our team of experts has researched the topic to provide the latest information. Check out this article to learn the tribes’ opinions and the current plans for sports betting. We will also briefly explain the state’s legislation and how these plans affect the future.

Oklahoma Gambling Laws

While the Sooner State is generally restrictive with its gambling laws, the presence of 39 tribes means you can find more than a hundred tribal casinos. Aside from slots, there are poker rooms and table games like blackjack and casino poker. If you prefer other types of gambling, you can also participate in parimutuel wagering, bingo games, or lotteries.

Unfortunately, the state does not have legislation for online gambling, whether that’s sports betting or casino games. Since 2020, there have been attempts to pass laws legalizing sports betting, like House Bill 3008, but they never passed the hearings. That’s why this new plan is an important event in the ongoing process of legalizing sports wagering.

Governor Stitt’s Plan and Tribal Opinion

In 2023, Governor Kyle Stitt proposed a legal framework to legalize land-based and online sports betting. The plan would give exclusive rights for in-person betting to tribal casinos, but any licensed entities can operate online gambling. Additionally, the state will tax 15% of in-person betting revenue and 20% of online income. Meanwhile, Senator Casey Murdoch has launched a bill based on this framework to legalize sports betting.

Upon initial review, we do not believe the plan represents the best interests for the people of Oklahoma or the tribal nations that have done so much to support the state.

Gary Batton, Choctaw Nation Chief

As online sports betting makes up around 90% of the revenue in legal states, the tribes are against this proposal as it excludes them. Stitt’s plan was also made without consulting any of the tribes, the Oklahoma Indian Gaming Association, or legislative leaders. Similar to 2020, when he tried to launch sports betting by agreeing with two tribes to create a new compact, this could lead to a lawsuit.

Future of Sports Betting

While Governor Stitt seems open to legalizing sports betting, any future bills must be discussed with the tribes. Although his previous proposals and actions have led to a rocky relationship, the tribes themselves are willing to discuss future legislation. While the governor wants to bring in more state revenue, any laws that cut the tribes from online betting revenue won’t be successful.

Meanwhile, the tribes are also preparing for the near future, as Governor Stitt’s term will end in 2026. If no progress is made until then, discussions will have to continue with the new governor. Senator Bill Coleman has also revealed plans for a bill in 2025, so state legislators are willing to implement sports betting.

Conclusion

Despite some challenges, the future of sports betting in Oklahoma appears positive. Both legislators and the tribes are willing to work towards legalizing sports betting, giving players more options at their preferred casinos. However, any plans must be carefully discussed with the tribes to avoid breaching their rights or undercutting revenue.